Résultats de recherche

be noted that the jurisdiction of courts of law can be the object of prospectives. If justice's necessities priori antagonists reveal contradictions middle ways can be taken into account in a way to strike a balance

authorities and rules on substance. Those rules can be effective depending on the way they apply in litigation basis of a judicial sphere including rules that can tackle anticompetitive behaviours and mergers that

law. But in the event of a major crisis legality can be mitigated. It is tolerated a legality of crisis important prerogatives recognized by the executive. This can be a risk for guaranteeing the exercise of fundamental

abnormal nor derivative they are the only effects that can be expected from it. Centuries of reform have only In the face of the predicted crises the jurist can no longer be satisfied with applying legal technique

injustice and violence are the final strands. How can we report on an anthropological phenomenon in the victimisation of Maupassian characters To what extent can a reading combining anthropology semiotics and ethnocriticism

data and methodology can be reused by others without compatibility problems. They can lead to the creation

termination of work practices can destabilize the habits of actors and in some cases can cause resistance mechanisms

greater effectiveness. To meet the challenge they can rely on the crucial asset that is their human potential that taking the actors singularity into account can have on the company s efficiency especially during

mechanisms implemented by MNCs. These mechanisms can be formal coordination by people by results and bureaucratic combined and even confused. Thus formal coordination can generate informal coordination which is a source

relationship marketing and the loyalty effect that can be enhanced by the mediator role of perceived value relationship orientation and the mediator role by which it can have an influence on the fidelity of these leaders