Résultats de recherche

submission of offers and subsist at the time of completion of the contract and not on the deadline for the request means of the restricted procedure. The first phase of the procedure request for participation ended at 3 solvency before the final term for the presentation of the participation request. The company invokes being possible in the later term for the presentation of the offers. In other words in the restricted procedure and the non-existence of exclusion grounds must be displayed on the date of the presentation of offers DECISION OF THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE OF MADRID, FEBRUARY 22ND, 2023, (ROJ: STSJ M 1886/2023 – ECL

content of Art. 57 of Directive 2014 24 EU is implemented by Art. 71 of LCSP. 2. FACTS The Judgment of the without analyzing the evidence presented. The Court holds that the work of the Regional Competition Authority it engaged in even at the private homes of the managers. The Court argues that the fact that two companies into four of them the most important ones and without competing separately for any of the other twenty-four evidence of a collusive agreement in the shape of market sharing. Due to the foregoing it upholds the appeal DECISION OF THE HIGHER COURT OF JUSTICE OF GALICIA, MARCH 10, 2023, (ROJ: STSJ GAL 1418/2023 – ECLI:

equivalent content of the Directive. 2. FACTS To understand the reasoning of the Judgment of the National Court service of La Rioja before the Ministry of Health of the Autonomous Government of La Rioja for access request presented by the Works Committee of the joint venture awarded the contract for the Sanitary Transport confidentiality in the terms provided for in article 14 h of the LTAIPBG. On the other hand the appellant also also argues the lack of legitimacy of the Works Committee to access the information on the offer submitted DECISION OF THE NATIONAL COURT SAN, OCTOBER 1, 2020 (JUR 2021, 335708) ECLI:ES:AN:2021:4382, SPAIN

be adjusted to the provisions of section 2 of Article 43 of the Consolidated Text of the General Law on ruling by the Higher Court of Justice of the Basque Country about the Spanish regulation of the Special Transposition of the rules for the reserved contracts in Art. 20 of Directive 2014 24 EU is in art. 43 of the General entity. Subsequently the High Court of Justice of Galicia confirmed the decision of the Galician administration Spanish law the Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council 2014 23 EU and 2014 24 EU of 26 February DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT, JUNE 1, 2023, (ROJ: STS 2758/2023 – ECLI:ES:TS:2023:2758), SPAIN

system one of the bidders challenged the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract to offer in the value of 1 in one of the two separate prices that the bidders needed to present the price relating made by the appellant regards only the partial price 1 for the initial phase of preparation of contract relevance with the Court saying that the tasks in question amounted to circa 2 of the contents of the contract considered to include Art. 1-A of the Code the bid must be excluded. As for Art. 69 of Directive 2014 24 EU regime DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 21.04.2022 (CASE 03/21.1BEBRG), PORTUGAL

refer to the contents of the offer and consequently was irrelevant for the application of the award criteria article 56 3 of Directive 2014 24 EU. In the version in force at the relevant time of the facts the provision issued prior to the date of submission of offers. The Court mentioned that Art. 72 3 of the PCC explicitly 56 3 of the Directive does not contain the same reference case law of the ECJ has accepted the nature include the TCO Certificate in the offer as grounds for exclusion of the offer. Considering the case law DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 27.01.2022 (CASE 0172/21.0BEBRG), PORTUGAL

with the wording of the Directive. Art. 69 2 f of the Directive only mentions the possibility of the tenderer ultimately led to the exclusion of the offer. On the one hand the company did not present the necessary information 3 of the PCC which transposes Art. 56 3 of the Directive the Court considered that supplementing the offer to include Art. 1-A 2 of the Code the bid must be excluded. As for Art. 69 of Directive 2014 24 EU regime and in the case at hand the calculations present in the documents pointed to a breach of the rules on DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 22.09.2022 (CASE 0339/21.1BECBR), PORTUGAL

purpose of the award criteria i.e. the Court gave relevance to the nature of the document in question information in the way the tender documents demanded and the other bidders argued that for this reason the offer inadmissible clarification of offers during the tender phase. The tender documents of an open procedure regarding they had presented e.g. the average area that a ton of cement can cover . One of the bidders did not present any new information to the offer . The first instance court ruled in favor of the contracting authority DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 08.09.2022 (CASE 0399/21.5BEAVR), PORTUGAL

70 2 e of the PCC. 2. FACTS During an open procedure for the award of a services contract for the provision However at the time of presentation of the bid the bidder had not applied to benefit from the reduction to include Art. 1-A 2 of the Code the bid must be excluded. As for Art. 69 of Directive 2014 24 EU regime contribution a percentage of the salary regarding Social Security. The claim was that the bidder in question reduction in the contribution for Social Security this is of course a policy measure from the State to reduce DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 09.06.2022 (CASE 01040/20.9BEBRG), PORTUGAL

examines the emergence and the political use of what has come to be known as culture wars in the United investigates the ways in which cultural identities are used for political ends. The book bridges the conceptual tapping into voters sense of neglect by the political elite. Applying the concept of national populism as as a binding conceptual framework for the book a prestigious panel of international experts offer thorough understanding the so-called culture wars in a British context as such it envisages debates as part of a larger l'ouvrage collectif "Towards a Very British Version of the “Culture Wars”: Populism, Social Fractures and Raphaële Kilty (eds.) / Towards a Very British Version of the “Culture Wars”... / Routledge, December 30, 2024 Towards a Very British Version of the “Culture Wars”: Populism, Social Fractures and Political Communication