Résultats de recherche

transport the waste the fifth to the existence of a machine for washing containers and the sixth to the existence second to the size of the refrigerated area in those facilities the third to the existence of a water treatment treatment station in the premises the fourth to the existence of a station for washing the vehicles which according to the Court was the fact that the bidder in question achieved maximum points in all the mentioned equipment of the bidders rather than the quality of the offers. The factors in question were several. JUDGMENT OF 20TH DECEMBER 2023 OF THE SAC (CASE 0693/20.2BELSB), PORTUGAL

4 of the PPCC. In its reasoning the Court also mentioned that in this case the principle of the rule understanding the aggrieved party may always appeal to the SAC for a possible restatement of the uniform decision of 17th August in its most literal way fixing uniform jurisprudence in the sense that the submission of issued . The question in need of answer is the following is the contracting authority obliged to accept and integrity. In short the PDF file allows the integrity and wholeness of the offer to be maintained JUDGMENT OF 17TH NOVEMBER 2023 OF THE SAC (CASE 210/18.4BELLE), PORTUGAL

offer in the value of 1 in one of the two separate prices that the bidders needed to present the price one of the bidders challenged the decision of the contracting authority to award the contract to a supplier doubt to the contracting authority or the other bidders. In addition the initial phase of the contract relevance with the Court saying that the tasks in question amounted to circa 2 of the contents of the contract if only for a part of the services to be provided was self-evidently insufficient to cover the costs of DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 21.04.2022 (CASE 03/21.1BEBRG), PORTUGAL

Directive 2014 24 EU. In the version in force at the relevant time of the facts the provision has since changed in the last amendment to the Code of November 2022 article 72 3 provided the following The jury certificate in question did not refer to the contents of the offer and consequently was irrelevant for the application according to the appelant the tender documents of the procedure apparently indicated the failure to include include the TCO Certificate in the offer as grounds for exclusion of the offer. Considering the case law of DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 27.01.2022 (CASE 0172/21.0BEBRG), PORTUGAL

Transposition of the rules for the reserved contracts in Art. 20 of Directive 2014 24 EU is in art. 43 of the General of the State to regulate the basic conditions that guarantee the equality of all Spaniards in the exercise rise to the appeal interpreting that the economic operator is entitled to be registered in the Galician JUDGMENT The Supreme Court recalls that in addition to the Galician legislation social assistance the Spanish such access to the reservation of contracts referred to in Article 20 of Directive 24 2014. The Supreme Court DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT, JUNE 1, 2023, (ROJ: STS 2758/2023 – ECLI:ES:TS:2023:2758), SPAIN

ultimately led to the exclusion of the offer. On the one hand the company did not present the necessary information obliged to control compliance with Labour Law and in the case at hand the calculations present in the documents required in the tender documents by the contracting authority which was meant to allow the contracting compete for public support to employ young workers. Addressing the issue the Court excluded the relevance relevance of the argument because the tender documents specified that the contractor had to take on the existing DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 22.09.2022 (CASE 0339/21.1BECBR), PORTUGAL

evaluated in the tender for the purpose of the award criteria i.e. the Court gave relevance to the nature of the document in question . Secondly the Court referred to the fact that the omission could in any of the bidders did not present this information in the way the tender documents demanded and the other documents in the exact same way as the contracting authority had requested it was possible to reach the said any new information to the offer . The first instance court ruled in favor of the contracting authority DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 08.09.2022 (CASE 0399/21.5BEAVR), PORTUGAL

was not possible to ascertain in the current case the existence of reasons to exclude the bid sustaining 2 e of the PCC. 2. FACTS During an open procedure for the award of a services contract for the provision Social Security. The claim was that the bidder in question intended not to pay the full amount of that reduction in the contribution for Social Security this is of course a policy measure from the State to reduce However at the time of presentation of the bid the bidder had not applied to benefit from the reduction DECISION OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (1ST SECTION), 09.06.2022 (CASE 01040/20.9BEBRG), PORTUGAL

confidentiality in the terms provided for in article 14 h of the LTAIPBG. On the other hand the appellant also hand the appellant considers that the whole content of the offer submitted to participate in the award procedure persons have the right to access public information in the terms provided in article 105 b of the Spanish Hence the Court finds meaningless to oppose lack of legitimacy to the Works Committee in knowing the technological offered by the company to obtain the award of the contract. The National Court explains that in this case DECISION OF THE NATIONAL COURT SAN, OCTOBER 1, 2020 (JUR 2021, 335708) ECLI:ES:AN:2021:4382, SPAIN

The American Sociologist Mai 2017 ISSN 0003-1232 The French Tradition of Sociology of International Relations The american sociologist The american sociologist Article : « The French Tradition of Sociology of International Relations: An Overview »